THE ENVIANCE BLOG

 Subscribe in a reader

Excerpt from:  Performance Management
.
February 12, 2009

International Energy Projects Will Now Focus on CO2

Four Local Governments and Environmentals Win in Court

There’s no getting around the topic of CO2 now. Everywhere you turn, you are hearing about it. No one can get away with not discussing it, which is the way it should be. We need to make our world healthier and cleaner for all. Businesses and consumers. The latest evidence of this is in what happened this week when two U.S. agencies agreed to address carbon dioxide emissions when financing overseas oil and gas projects. This settles a lawsuit brought by environmentalists and four local governments.

Under the agreement, the Export-Import Bank must begin accounting for CO2 emissions when evaluating fossil-fuel projects and will create an organization-wide carbon policy, and the Overseas Private Investment Corp. (OPIC) must set a goal to reduce major projects' emissions by 20 percent.

Both agencies must also commit to increase funding for renewable energy projects.

Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace and Boulder, Colo., sued the agencies in 2002, accusing them of violating the National Environmental Policy Act by providing more than $32 billion for fossil-fuel projects without assessing their impacts on climate change. Three California cities joined the lawsuit in 2006.

Fossil-fuel projects funded by the agencies between 1990 and 2003 produced the equivalent of nearly 8 percent of global CO2 emissions, the groups said.

"This settlement is a substantial victory for our climate," said Michelle Chan, senior policy analyst at Friends of the Earth. "It will force federal agencies to move away from fossil fuel projects and account for the climate impacts of their lending."

Phil Cogan, a spokesman for the Export-Import Bank, said the agency was pleased with the settlement. "The actions that we have agreed to take extend the efforts in promoting the environmentally friendly exports and concern for the environment that we've been leading the other exporters in since the early 1990s," he said.

That’s funny, I wonder why he didn’t take that posture during 1990 – 2003 when he was busy polluting the earth? Seems like he had no choice. It’s unfortunate that advocacy groups have to sue in order to get these large organizations to change behavior. In the future, let’s hope it’s different, that we are led by individuals who have more concern for the earth, for its people, for our grandchildren and for nature than the almighty dollar.

 


Syndication OptionsRSS (Rich Site Summary) Feed Atom Feed OPML (Outline Processor Language) Feed MYST-ML (MyST Markup Language) Content Feed MS-Office Smart Tag Subscription